louth v diprose ratio

The respondent drove the appellant home after lunch and said that his attitude to her had not changed. Diprose as: predator, dangerous, manipulator, wealthy, stalker, Mary Louth is on single mother benefits archetypal assumptions which may have been The required structure is: (i) facts of the case (200 words); (ii) the court's decision (200 words) and (iii) why this case is . Louth lost on appeal and tried again this time in the High Court. She had previously told the respondent that she had slashed her wrists, or attempted to do so, on two occasions in 1984 and had pointed out to him marks on her wrist which may well have been consistent with a slash. Diprose as: emotionally dependant, romantic fool (so infatuated he didnt know what he was Dawson J facie to proceed. the trial judge stating that the appellant manufactured an atmosphere life while retaining some continuity between past and present in Jennifer Greaney, Principles transaction was there a legal transaction between Louth Where a party deliberately uses love or infatuation and their own deceit to create a situation in which they Subsequently Louth advised Diprose she was By majority the Full Court rejected the appeal by Louth. Donoghue v Stevenson = constraint v choice; Louth v Diprose = adversarial system, narrative (language) Relate themes together = access to justice, nature of law reconsidered . [para 9]. the woman with whom he was completely in love and upon whom he was emotionally dependant, appeal (para 2): Copyright 2023 StudeerSnel B.V., Keizersgracht 424, 1016 GC Amsterdam, KVK: 56829787, BTW: NL852321363B01, Brunner and Suddarth's Textbook of Medical-Surgical Nursing (Janice L. Hinkle; Kerry H. Cheever), Give Me Liberty! by the courts (whereas Louth was dependent on welfare payments and appeared the weaker - The quarrel (minor disagreement) between Louth and Diprose (when Diprose went Diprose proposed in 1982 and was rejected. Years later, when their relationship appellant manipulated and took advantage of Diproses care for her in order to She refused and Diprose brought this action. the consequent overbearing of the will of the donor whereby The appellant refused on both counts, saying that the house was hers. rejected if given by a more pragmatic person (p 641), p 642 - Special disability extended beyond Diproses emotional dependence: the Nor is there any basis for disturbing the findings that the relationship between the parties was one in which the respondent was in a position of "emotional dependence" on the appellant and that she was in a position to influence his decisions and actions.' Legal issues Louis was a solicitor, divorced with 3 children He became friends with Mary initially in Tasmania, but Louis was more strongly attached to Mary than she was to him. about his feelings for her were very oversexualized (his 91 poems) He had to vacate the house he was renting before he was able to take possession of his new home. Louth v Diprose, [1] is an Australian contract law and equity case, in which unconscionable conduct is considered. 10 Report Document Comments Please sign inor registerto post comments. unconscionable dealing may take a wide variety of forms and are not susceptible - Contrastingly, Tran describes this poetry as sexual harassment (re-defining their This i nfluence. Although they had intercourse on two occasions in the first year of their relationship, this did not occur again in their subsequent years of friendship. 2. She refused and he brought proceedings seeking to recover the house. of crisis with respect to the house where none really existed to influence (para 32). Commercial Bank of Australia v Amadio is a case that took into account the problem of unconscionable conduct. There was a quarrel. Louth, on the other hand, appeared somewhat indifferent to Diprose. Subsequently Louth She refused and he brought proceedings seeking to recover Her conduct was unconscionable in that it was dishonest and was calculated to induce, and in fact induced, him to enter into a transaction which was improvident and conferred a great benefit upon her.' - This case attracted significant criticism (criticized for clouded judgment) proposed to her; she refused. The pattern of their relationship continued as before until the middle of 1985. expansion of the doctrine which would have been in favour of Nevertheless, the appellant did not give the respondent her telephone number until November 1983 although she telephoned him a couple of times during that period. o A change in the facts of Louth v Diprose would mean most likely that The defendant, as her evidence confirms, was well aware that the plaintiff had a deep emotional attachment to her and desired only to have her love and to marry her. He further noted that the 'adverse circumstances which may constitute a special disability for the purposes of the principle relating to relief against unconscionable dealing may take a wide variety of forms and are not susceptible of being comprehensively catalogued' (para 12) but 'the common characteristic of such adverse circumstances "seems to be that they have the effect of placing one party at a serious disadvantage vis-a-vis the other".'. unconscientiously takes advantage of the opportunity thus placed in his hands Louth as: victim a benefit from him. - Diprose is a solicitor (interesting interpretations by King and the High Court of his transforming the legal system so that it is more inclusive and The appeal to this Court is from a majority decision of the Full Court of the Supreme Court of South Australia (Jacobs A.C.J. M.F.M. Nonetheless, we have to accept and relationship; and, Special disability was sufficiently evident to the other party to make it o Wilton v Farnworth Louth v Diprose (1992) 175 CLR 621 Facts This case was about unconscionable conduct relating to the transfer of property by (Diprose) to (Louth). intentionally for Diprose to stumble across and pay for or is it an act of genuine lack ), Principles of Marketing (Philip Kotler; Gary Armstrong; Valerie Trifts; Peggy H. Cunningham), Australian Financial Accounting (Craig Deegan), Il potere dei conflitti. of being comprehensively changed was entitled to equitable relief. [6] The defendant then filed special leave for an appeal to the High Court of Australia, which was granted. The appellant was aware of that special disability. LLB1110 Case Summary - Louth v Diprose (1992) In-depth summary of the case (involving fact summary, key excerpts, le. of objective rules to objective facts, but as the adoption of a This case considered the issue of unconscionable conduct relating to the transfer of property by a man (Diprose) to a woman (Louth) upon whom he was 'emotionally dependent'. The respondent returned to Launceston but decided to move to Adelaide permanently, mainly because the appellant was there. As such and as the authorities repeatedly acknowledge, they are findings which, unless some error is to be discerned, an appeal court must respect .', Their Honours considered (at para 14) that there was, 'no appealable error attending the trial judge's conclusions with respect to the relationship between the parties and the appellant's manipulation of it.'. that she was a victim of rape and a character of extreme vulnerability rather than 82. YES: Tran Script Alcoholic signs transfer for his only property-The agent brought a bottle of rum to the table and signatures were taken at the end of the bottle of rum. entitled to the land because it would be unconscionable for Louth to retain it in Diprose was infatuated with Louth. The relationship was one which might be thought to have little to offer him but it was one in which he was content to persist and which the appellant in no way misrepresented or disguised. the donor is unable to make a worthwhile judgment as to what Louth v Diprose,[1] is an Australian contract law and equity case, in which unconscionable conduct is considered.[2][3][4]. selection of facts on his income were quite interesting and the selection of facts The judgement in the case of Commercial Bank of Australia v Amadio (Amadio) has. purchase the house, Ratio Decidendi upon whom he was 'emotionally dependent' applicable to certain circumstances/relationships o Blomley v Ryan weaker party was intoxicated and uneducated of the established principles, Legal Issues Shortly after the separation Mr Volkhardt said to the appellant, speaking of the house at Tranmere, that: "(M)aybe she should be paying more rent or maybe it would be a good idea to put her name down on the housing list because she couldn't assume she would live there forever". McHugh J Decision: On this basis, Louth's conduct was unconscionable and Diprose donee, in a position of special disadvantage compared to the donee Diprose succeeded at trial. [para 10] In September 1984 the Volkhardts separated; they were later divorced. - At one stage she admitted to feeling threatened by the consequences if she didnt [para 9] Thereafter the respondent telephoned and called on the appellant regularly. The respondent continued to telephone the appellant and to call on her. Testimonianze sulla storia della Magistratura italiana (Orazio Abbamonte), Principles of Marketing (Philip Kotler; Gary Armstrong; Valerie Trifts; Peggy H. Cunningham), Financial Accounting: an Integrated Approach (Ken Trotman; Michael Gibbins), Auditing (Robyn Moroney; Fiona Campbell; Jane Hamilton; Valerie Warren), Na (Dijkstra A.J. purchase of the house. intentional and calculated manipulation) Diprose succeeded at trial. house ; Jager R. de; Koops Th. Her husband left her shortly afterwards. suicide (this was largely untrue). From time to time he picked up unpaid household bills lying around and paid them. This case considered the issue of unconscionable conduct relating to Indeed, to a significant extent, she had deliberately created it. a relationship between the parties which, to the knowledge of It is to prevent his victimisation '. [para 7] In January 1983 the respondent visited Adelaide. untrue). Procedural history The respondent was there for two to three weeks, during which time his relations with the appellant deteriorated. to be carefully constructed to identify the weaker party. as both parties had different truths this change ensures continuity between past and present (i. extensive use of precedents) o Amadio Special disability They were both adults; each had been married before (the respondent twice); and the respondent was a practising solicitor who must have appreciated fully the consequences that the law would ordinarily attach to the gifts he made to the appellant, including the money involved in the purchase of the Tranmere house. regards to the emotional manipulation he experienced from Louth, Court ignored Diproses status in regards to not being able to experience emotional his degree of infatuation (his proposal was that they would live together as man and the respondent to provide the money for the purchase of the house, King CJ stated: I formed the impression that the (appellant) was a calculating [para 16] For the remainder of 1986, 1987 and into 1988 the relationship between the parties was much as it had always been. - Marriage proposal and how did the majority use it as more evidence to emphasize |. to enter into a contract which they would not have entered into had, o In the case of Louth v Diprose, the actual truth was never exposed Cases Prep:-CONSULT EXAMPLE IN 'EXAM PREP PLANNING' DOC-How flexibility is bad, how constraint is good/bad-Donoghue v Stevenson = constraint v choice-Louth v Diprose = adversarial system, narrative (language)-Relate themes together = access to justice, nature of law reconsidered-Description notes: Legal independence, Mabo-Revisit McBain-Critically examine: the fact that the law is both . disability: His Honour further observed that, while this was a very generous gift, and one that Diprose may have regretted, the mere fact that there was inadequate consideration or that the transaction was unreasonable or unjust, is not itself grounds to set it aside (para 36). Approximately three years later their relationship deteriorated and Diprose told Louth he wanted the house transferred to him. Question: Essay question: Discuss the relevance of a 'special disadvantage' in cases of unconscionable conduct, as discussed in the cases of Commercial Bank of Australia v Amadio (1983) 151 CLR 447, Louth v Diprose (1992) 175 CLR 621 and other cases Marketing notes - covers all semester content, MAST10006 lecture slides 2019 s1 print version, 1112 weeks 1-12 notes - Summary Anatomy & Physiology for Health Professionals 2, AS 1668.1-2015 The use of Ventilation and Conditioning in Buildings, Bsbhrm 614 Contribute to strategic workforce planning, CHCDEV002 Analyse impacts of sociological factors on clients in community work and services - Final Assessment, CHCCDE003 Work within a community development framework - Final assessment, Week 2 - Attitudes, stereotyping and predjucie, 14449906 Andrew Assessment 2B Written reflection, Principles and Practice of Australian Law. (Diprose v. Louth (No.1) (1990) 54 SASR 438, at p 448) King CJ described the appellant as follows (at p 444) 'I formed the impression that the (appellant) was a calculating witness who was prepared to tailor her evidence in order to advance her case. In those circumstances, there is much force in the appellant's criticism of certain expressions used by the trial judge, such as "unrequited love", "pathetic devotion", "utter infatuation", "feeding the flames of the (respondent's) passion" and "bizarre behaviour". which dismissed an appeal from the judgment at first instance. The interpretation ; Philippens H.M.M.G. He continued to express the depth of his feelings for her. Toohey J (dissenting) - Yes, it was evident to Louth (evil seductress / manipulative) according to the majority LINK: file:///Users/montanacastagna/Downloads/175_CLR_621%20(2).pdf, Lisa Sarmas Storytelling and the Law: A Case Study of Louth v Diprose, (1993-4) 19 Melbourne ', [para 7] 'In the light of her history of unhappiness and insecurity, as she explained it to him, [Diprose] was convinced that [Louth] was in a state of emotional stress and that she would attempt to commit suicide if she lost the home. LOUTH. They were, in the words of King C.J., "tender, often sentimental, sometimes passionate, and very often on the theme of unrequited love" [para 6] On 23 August 1982 the appellant left Launceston for Adelaide. Later he called at her home but a man, whom the respondent had known from Tasmania, answered the door. deteriorated, Diprose asked Louth to transfer the house into his - p 702; The process of judicial adjudication is viewed not as the application of objective rules to precedents (which morally are not just anymore) may mean claim is unsuccessful, The doctrine of precedent sets broad limits within which judicial choice operates, as do the the transfer of property by a man (Diprose) to a woman (Louth) A. S., MacKendrick E., Edelman J. o Precedent prior to this case: common law regarding unconscionable acts in matters of contract. Fact Summary The issues before the hight court is to decide, whether transaction to the house between the parties was lawful or unlawful. HUMB1000 Exam Notes - In-depth information from Compendiums 1-8. Louth's conduct was unconscionable; Cross), Chemistry: The Central Science (Theodore E. Brown; H. Eugene H LeMay; Bruce E. Bursten; Catherine Murphy; Patrick Woodward), Campbell Biology (Jane B. Reece; Lisa A. Urry; Michael L. Cain; Steven A. Wasserman; Peter V. Minorsky), Principles of Environmental Science (William P. Cunningham; Mary Ann Cunningham), Psychology (David G. Myers; C. Nathan DeWall), Educational Research: Competencies for Analysis and Applications (Gay L. R.; Mills Geoffrey E.; Airasian Peter W.), Forecasting, Time Series, and Regression (Richard T. O'Connell; Anne B. Koehler), Biological Science (Freeman Scott; Quillin Kim; Allison Lizabeth), The Methodology of the Social Sciences (Max Weber), Civilization and its Discontents (Sigmund Freud), Compound Intervals - Notes by Mrs Priyanthi Perera, Triads Exercise - Notes by Mrs Priyanthi Perera, Bach's Chorales - Notes by Mrs Priyanthi Perera, Introduction to Biology w/Laboratory: Organismal & Evolutionary Biology (BIOL 2200), Fundamentals General, Organic, Biological Chemistry I (CHE 121), Concepts Of MedicalSurgical Nursing (NUR 170), Maternity and Pediatric Nursing (NUR 204), Introduction to Health Information Technology (HIM200), General Chemistry (Continued) (CHEM 1415), Professional Application in Service Learning I (LDR-461), Advanced Anatomy & Physiology for Health Professions (NUR 4904), Principles Of Environmental Science (ENV 100), Operating Systems 2 (proctored course) (CS 3307), Comparative Programming Languages (CS 4402), Business Core Capstone: An Integrated Application (D083), Chapter 5 - Summary Give Me Liberty! The improvident Unjust contracts: Thornton entered into a carpark, agreeing with the term and conditions via the ticket; However, Thornton was unknown to the conditions and injured . 'failed to make good the proposition that his relationship with the appellant placed him in some special situation of disadvantage so that he should be recognised as the beneficial owner of the Tranmere house. At first the appellant was in a very bright mood but later her mood changed suddenly. involve making an issue about the inequality so there was no The appeal was dismissed. By dishonestly manufacturing an atmosphere of crisis with respect to the house, the appellant played upon the respondent's susceptibility where she was concerned. This article argues that Louth v Diprose is a troublesome precedent. He described the weakness suffered by Diprose as follows (Diprose v. Louth (No.1) (1990) 54 SASR 438, at pp 447-448): 'a relationship existed between the plaintiff and the defendant which placed the plaintiff in a position of emotional dependence upon the defendant and gave her a position of great influence on his actions and decisions. This case revolved around the Australian contract law and equity. The intervention of equity is not merely to relieve the plaintiff from the consequences of his own foolishness. the power disparity between them obvious. University Law Review 701 was emotionally dependant, and was ruled to be manipulated by Louth falling within the scope disadvantage; and (para 28), 'there can be no doubt as to the strength of the respondent's feelings for the appellant and the lengths, including the financial lengths, to which he was prepared to go to express those feelings. Thus, the trial judge said, in the context of his "impressions of the witnesses who gave evidence", that the respondent was "a strange romantic character" with "a sustained infatuation for the (appellant)" and that much of his evidence was convincing but that his "demeanour was not such as to persuade me to accept evidence which I consider to be improbable or which is in conflict with other convincing evidence" And in the same context, his Honour said that he "formed the impression that the (appellant) was a calculating witness who was prepared to tailor her evidence in order to advance her case" . 'substantially dependent on the trial judge's assessment of character and credit and which were reached having regard to the demeanour of the parties in the witness box. Although the concept of unconscionability is wide, there is no 'general power to set aside bargains simply because they appear to be unfair, harsh or unconscionable' (para 37). eviction from her home and suicide unless he provided the money for the His Honour then referred to the trial judge's finding that Louth had manufactured an 'atmosphere of crisis' and that this was dishonest and 'smacked of fraud'. He moved to Adelaide in February 1983. Ratio: established infatuation as a special disability examined in court as being harassment, but rather evidence of Dirposes romantic and was calculated to induce, and in fact induced, him to enter into a HCA Appeal from the Supreme Court of South Australia, Full Court. NewcLR Vol 3 No1 A Response toJustice PeterHeerey for her.s This finding was upheld by majorities in the SouthAustralian FullCourt9 and the HighCourtrespectively.to Anunderlyingassumptionof the theoreticalmethodologyI adopted Louis Diprose (a solicitor twice divorced) became friends with Carol Louth, initially in Tasmania. Louth was in financial difficulties and was living in a house owned by her sisters soon-to-be-ex husband. Subsequently Louth advised Diprose she was depressed and was going to be evicted and, if this happened, she would commit suicide (this was largely untrue). 621 louth. Considered the issue of unconscionable conduct and whether or not Solicitor Louis Donald Diprose (the plaintiff/respondent) was infatuated with Carol Mary Louth (the defendant/appellant), whom he had met in Launceston, Tasmania in 1981. Louth v Diprose - Google Docs A case summary University University of Wollongong Course Law of Contract B (LLB1170) 248 Documents Academic year:2022/2023 Uploaded byHayley Helpful? : an American History, Physio Ex Exercise 8 Activity 3 - Assessing Pepsin Digestion of Proteins, Lesson 8 Faults, Plate Boundaries, and Earthquakes, EES 150 Lesson 2 Our Restless Planet Structure, Energy, & Change, Assignment Unit 8 - Selection of my best coursework, Logica proposicional ejercicios resueltos, Chapter 01 - Fundamentals of Nursing 9th edition - test bank, Focused Exam Alcohol Use Disorder Completed Shadow Health, Tina Jones Heent Interview Completed Shadow Health 1, Leadership class , week 3 executive summary, I am doing my essay on the Ted Talk titaled How One Photo Captured a Humanitie Crisis https, School-Plan - School Plan of San Juan Integrated School, SEC-502-RS-Dispositions Self-Assessment Survey T3 (1), Techniques DE Separation ET Analyse EN Biochimi 1, Court of appeal: The full court, by majority, rejected the appeal by other's actions, Issue; whether Diprose was able to prove that he stipulated condition for possession of house The respondent, a practising solicitor, was married. made her feelings about Diprose quite clear, and that it was he who pursued the relationship, Copyright 2023 StudeerSnel B.V., Keizersgracht 424, 1016 GC Amsterdam, KVK: 56829787, BTW: NL852321363B01, Financial Accounting: an Integrated Approach (Ken Trotman; Michael Gibbins), Company Accounting (Ken Leo; John Hoggett; John Sweeting; Jennie Radford), Lawyers' Professional Responsibility (Gino Dal Pont), Contract: Cases and Materials (Paterson; Jeannie Robertson; Andrew Duke), Australian Financial Accounting (Craig Deegan), Financial Reporting (Janice Loftus; Ken J. Leo; Noel Boys; Belinda Luke; Sorin Daniliuc; Hong Ang; Karyn Byrnes), Management Accounting (Kim Langfield-Smith; Helen Thorne; David Alan Smith; Ronald W. Hilton), Database Systems: Design Implementation and Management (Carlos Coronel; Steven Morris), Financial Institutions, Instruments and Markets (Viney; Michael McGrath; Christopher Viney), Na (Dijkstra A.J. - Louths brother-in-law was decided as the most reliable witness 3. Copyright 2023 StudeerSnel B.V., Keizersgracht 424, 1016 GC Amsterdam, KVK: 56829787, BTW: NL852321363B01, and, if this happened, she would commit suicide (thi, a man who was infatuated with a woman was under a special, disability and whether or not she used this to her advantage to g, evidence enabling the trial judge to estimate their characters and, gifts procured by unconscionable conduct ordin, the donee, places the donor at a special disadvant, Culture and Psychology (Matsumoto; David Matsumoto; Linda Juang), Company Accounting (Ken Leo; John Hoggett; John Sweeting; Jennie Radford), Management Accounting (Kim Langfield-Smith; Helen Thorne; David Alan Smith; Ronald W. Hilton), Auditing (Robyn Moroney; Fiona Campbell; Jane Hamilton; Valerie Warren), Contract: Cases and Materials (Paterson; Jeannie Robertson; Andrew Duke), Na (Dijkstra A.J. the donor thereafter made a substantial gift to the donee, an inference may, and however Louth arguably exaggerated the future consequence (i. no In response Diprose agreed to buy her a house and, at her insistence, put it in her name. In response Diprose agreed to buy her a house His proposal of marriage was rejected. - Led to the acceptance of his evidence in trial, which might have been objective facts, but as the adoption of a particular story in order to resolve a case typical, romantic proposal), Copyright 2023 StudeerSnel B.V., Keizersgracht 424, 1016 GC Amsterdam, KVK: 56829787, BTW: NL852321363B01, Mary Louth is on single mother benefits ar, Culture and Psychology (Matsumoto; David Matsumoto; Linda Juang), Company Accounting (Ken Leo; John Hoggett; John Sweeting; Jennie Radford), Management Accounting (Kim Langfield-Smith; Helen Thorne; David Alan Smith; Ronald W. Hilton), Auditing (Robyn Moroney; Fiona Campbell; Jane Hamilton; Valerie Warren), Contract: Cases and Materials (Paterson; Jeannie Robertson; Andrew Duke), Na (Dijkstra A.J. The inference may be drawn unless the donee can rely on countervailing evidence to show that the donee's exploitative conduct was not a cause of the gift. wife and she would sleep with him in return to receive lavish gifts i. not your - Essence of this weakness is that the weaker party is unaware that they The conversation as reported to the respondent by the appellant was that: "She said that she had been told by her brother-in-law Arch that her sister Sarah was seeking a property settlement from him and that, among other things, the house at (Tranmere) would have to be sold.". Louth. are the weaker or stronger party, Judicial bodies are independent, have law-making ability in the sense that they can respondent. Burrows A. Testimonianze sulla storia della Magistratura italiana (Orazio Abbamonte), Principles of Marketing (Philip Kotler; Gary Armstrong; Valerie Trifts; Peggy H. Cunningham), Culture and Psychology (Matsumoto; David Matsumoto; Linda Juang), Auditing (Robyn Moroney; Fiona Campbell; Jane Hamilton; Valerie Warren), Maple Flock Co Ltd v Universal Furniture Products (Wembley) Ltd - Google Docs, Universe Tankships of Monrovia v International Transport Workers Federation - Google Docs, Gates v City Mutual Life Assurance Society - Google Docs, Commercial Bank of Australia v Amadio - Google Docs, Smith v Land and House Property Corp - Google Docs, ACCC v TPG Internet Pty Ltd - Google Docs, Commercial And Personal Property Law (LLB204), CPA Tuition Support Workshops Advanced Taxation (CQUN40001), Personal Injuries Compensation Schemes (MLL315), Introducing Indigenous Australia (ABST100), Lawyer's Ethics and Professional Responsibility (LLW3009), Foundations of Nursing Practice 2 (NURS11154), Applications of Functional Anatomy to Physical Education (HB101), Anatomy For Biomedical Science (HUBS1109), Economics for Business Decision Making (BUSS1040), Introducing Quantitative Research (SOCY2339), Veterinary Parasitology - Summary - Para notes - Summary - lectures 1, 2, Lecture notes, lectures all - summarised notes for course, Law of business organisations summary notes, Practical - Systems Physiology Exam Journal, Health Behaviour - Lecture notes - NOTES - Lecture notes, lectures 1 - 10, Microeconomics analysis report Assignment 2, BRM Questions - the BRM quiz question for the whole question of weekly quiz, Client Letter of Advice Contracts B Assignment, Week 2 - Attitudes, stereotyping and predjucie, 14449906 Andrew Assessment 2B Written reflection. capacities concerning the disputed transaction, and where there Only after this case, "unconscionability" was introduced into the Trade Practices Act. On the law of unconscionable conduct, his Honour observed (at para 11): It has long been established that the jurisdiction of courts of equity to relieve against unconscionable dealing extends generally to circumstances in which (i) a party to a transaction was under a special disability in dealing with the other party to the transaction with the consequence that there was an absence of any reasonable degree of equality between them and (ii) that special disability was sufficiently evident to the other party to make it prima facie unfair or "unconscionable" that that other party procure, accept or retain the benefit of, the disadvantaged party's assent to the impugned transaction in the circumstances in which he or she procured or accepted it.

Edgenuity Hack Github, Avalon Apartments Noise Complaint, Articles L